When playing an RPG - a character's abilities and inabilities are governed by those skills which one unlocks. Are genetics/epigenetics working in the same way? (Does all of the information for a trait or skill exist - and is it only unlocked by one's experience?)
An RPG is a non-generative system. It has no emergent, irrational, or negentropic properties.
By contrast, human natural language, though rule-based, is generative. i.e., new terms, usages, and structures arise in natural language use.
Life (which language mirrors to an extent) is profoundly generative, irrational, negentropic, and principally characterized by emergent properties.
So, genetics, like language is not fixed and bounded like an RPG. The identification of epigenetic processes working within a genetic context - was pretty much an inevitability.
Check this article in the current issue of Technology Review for a bracing illustration whereof I write above.
The game example is similar to my interpretation of IQ tests. I'm not sure what means the "current interpretation".
Back to the genetics/epigenetics question. Under Rolf Landauer and Charles Bennett's interpretation of information theory and the backwards arrow of time, there IS an explanation of reality which makes genetics/epigenetics similar to an RPG.
Namely, they posit that evolution results from the backward scatter of information from the future and that the capture of information transiting that backward arrow of time is what accounts for the negentropic or progressive changes exhibited by evolving systems.
@ SeeNew - Concerning the concepts of Rolf and Chas; So would this be humans trying to become God-like? As in reaching our ultimate potential? As though man were created to evolve into perfection after all.
crystals "grow", but they don't "reproduce" - speaking of which - my man Frobel had some very interesting notions about crystals and exerted a profound influence on the structure of education in the modern era.
Staying on topic, I think the most basic chemical/mechanical process that "just happens" and which comes REAL close on the "reproduction" tip is what happens in clays.
Clay is semi-crystalline. However, it's composed of fine layers, think somewhat along the lines of phyllo dough. Those layers are subject to mechanical drift and shearing. When that shearing event happens, half of the semi-crystalline structures in the layer are displaced and continue to regrow, giving you this mechanically induced reproduction of structures in the layers. Think along the lines of xeroxing paper.
Personally, I don't believe that that qualifies as living either, just that it comes very close, so close in fact that if you had organic compounds and structures, like those liposomes or others, embedded in the clay layers - they would naturally be subject to the mechanically induced "growth and reproduction" process occurring in the clays and that might be sufficient to bootstrap autopoetic growth and reproduction events in increasingly complex and rapidly cycled organic compounds and structures. Matter of fact, you might just have a perpetual flux of increasing complexity and information density in organic compounds and structures embedded in clays.
@ SeeNew - The clay example is one that I can easily look at. Most of our ground is made up of clay here in Beaumont. Sometimes it just stinks - but that could be the petro-products seeping through the ground.
"Sabbatean"? As in Sabbats - Don't tell me that I'm thinking like a Wikken
Concerning to whom the fault of oppression belongs; "We are not all equally guilty but we are all equally responsible" - Rabbi Abraham Hescel
Concerning blaming others for the problem; "...And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?... - Matthew: 7 1-5
Concerning how to fix the problems concerning oppression; "Someone once said that the word 'motivation' should never be used in the singular. Some combination of motives always exist and it's impossible for anyone to qualify the proportion of each that is involved in any given act" - Warren Buffet (in an interview in the USA Today)
Please take into account that the views expressed on my blog are prefaced with; in my opinion, in my experience or even (sometimes) random observations and/or thoughts. Please make your statements without the endless litany of cross referenced materials. Source information is fine but I'll just assume that you've done due diligence and that your statements are correct or an accepted editorial. Thank you, UBJ
Other People's Blogs About Politics, Race, Social Change
10 comments:
No John.
An RPG is a non-generative system. It has no emergent, irrational, or negentropic properties.
By contrast, human natural language, though rule-based, is generative. i.e., new terms, usages, and structures arise in natural language use.
Life (which language mirrors to an extent) is profoundly generative, irrational, negentropic, and principally characterized by emergent properties.
So, genetics, like language is not fixed and bounded like an RPG. The identification of epigenetic processes working within a genetic context - was pretty much an inevitability.
Check this article in the current issue of Technology Review for a bracing illustration whereof I write above.
http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22450/
Even at the level of non-living substances, there is something quite extraordinary going on.
@ SeeNew - But isn't the game example similar to the current interpretation of IQ tests?
The game example is similar to my interpretation of IQ tests. I'm not sure what means the "current interpretation".
Back to the genetics/epigenetics question. Under Rolf Landauer and Charles Bennett's interpretation of information theory and the backwards arrow of time, there IS an explanation of reality which makes genetics/epigenetics similar to an RPG.
Namely, they posit that evolution results from the backward scatter of information from the future and that the capture of information transiting that backward arrow of time is what accounts for the negentropic or progressive changes exhibited by evolving systems.
@ SeeNew - Damn... I just finished reading that MIT article and then you assign MORE homework?
("Current Interpretation" (Excluding UCBM and Big Don)meaning; Not having anything to do with race.)
The article stated that something has to exhibit 'growth and reproduction' in order to be deemed as living.
Would common rust fill the bill?
@ SeeNew - Concerning the concepts of Rolf and Chas; So would this be humans trying to become God-like?
As in reaching our ultimate potential?
As though man were created to evolve into perfection after all.
Would common rust fill the bill?
nah. rust just happens, it doesn't "reproduce".
crystals "grow", but they don't "reproduce" - speaking of which - my man Frobel had some very interesting notions about crystals and exerted a profound influence on the structure of education in the modern era.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Wilhelm_August_Froebel
Staying on topic, I think the most basic chemical/mechanical process that "just happens" and which comes REAL close on the "reproduction" tip is what happens in clays.
Clay is semi-crystalline. However, it's composed of fine layers, think somewhat along the lines of phyllo dough. Those layers are subject to mechanical drift and shearing. When that shearing event happens, half of the semi-crystalline structures in the layer are displaced and continue to regrow, giving you this mechanically induced reproduction of structures in the layers. Think along the lines of xeroxing paper.
Personally, I don't believe that that qualifies as living either, just that it comes very close, so close in fact that if you had organic compounds and structures, like those liposomes or others, embedded in the clay layers - they would naturally be subject to the mechanically induced "growth and reproduction" process occurring in the clays and that might be sufficient to bootstrap autopoetic growth and reproduction events in increasingly complex and rapidly cycled organic compounds and structures. Matter of fact, you might just have a perpetual flux of increasing complexity and information density in organic compounds and structures embedded in clays.
So would this be humans trying to become God-like?
nah. but it might be an awful lot like humans as organic compounds/structures embedded in spatio-temporal clay.
Just playing.
Structurally, that concept is VERY close to the Sabbattean divine cosmology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbateans
@ SeeNew - The clay example is one that I can easily look at.
Most of our ground is made up of clay here in Beaumont.
Sometimes it just stinks - but that could be the petro-products seeping through the ground.
"Sabbatean"? As in Sabbats - Don't tell me that I'm thinking like a Wikken
nah, it's an heretical jewish sect founded by Sabbatai Zevi.
@ SeeNew - Oh - I know (now). I looked it up after you mentioned it.
Post a Comment